Stillness and Time_ Photography and the Moving Image.pdf

(40455 KB) Pobierz
Contents
07
09
Foreword and Acknowledgements
Marking Time: Photography, Film and Temporalities of
the Image
David Green
23
39
Real Time: Instantaneity and the Photographic Imaginary
Mary Ann Doane
Stillness Becoming: Reflections on Bazin, Barthes, and
Photographic Stillness
jonathan Friday
55
65
79
97
"3
Thinking Stillness
Yve Lomax
Portraits, Still Video Portraits and the Account of the Soul
joanna Lowry
Melancholia
2
Kaja Silverman
Posing, Acting, Photography
David Campany
The Film-Still and its Double: Reflections on the 'Found'
Film-Still
john Stezaker
127
151
165
Frame/d Time: A Photogrammar of the Fantastic
Garrett Stewart
The Possessive Spectator
Laura Mulvey
Possessive, Pensive and Possessed
Victor Burgin
179
183
Notes on Contributors
List of Illustrations
Foreword and Acknowledgem ents
The s tarting point for this book was a conference bearing the sa me title
organised by Photoforum and held at the Kent Institute of Art and Design
in Canterbury in 2004. Th e m ajority of the essays publis hed here were
presented there for the first time. The thinking behind that ini tiative had
been to open up a s pace for recons idering the relationship between
photographic theory a nd the theory of the moving image as that has been
articulated in th e study of fi lm. Each of these areas had developed a rich and
sophi sticated body of ideas and modes of ana lysis during the 1970S and ea rly
'980s, inAuenced by semiotics, Ma rxism, psychoanalysis, post-structuralism
;md
phenomenology. Yet whil st in evitably there had been some degree of
intercha nge between photog ra phy theory and fi lm theory each, neverth eless,
rema in ed fairly di screte from the othe r. I ndeed, as the introd uctory essay in
tli is book points out, the seminal writings by such figures as Walte r Benjamin,
Siegfried Kracauer, Andre Bazi n , Roland Barthes and Chris tian Metz te nded
1
focus upon wha t were seen as the essential diffe rences between the two
0
,"ediums of photography and film. Concepts of stillness, moveme nt and
lime were articu lated in a manner in which those differences cou ld be both
ide ntified and maintained.
It
seemed to us that thi s implicit understanding was in need of re-
<"valuation. The primary reason why s uch a re-evaluation was necessa ry -
and perhaps even made possible - is undoubtedly the impact of new image
I<"chnologies. Technologica l developments and the emergence of the digital
,nl erface have seen the progressive e rosion of the bounda ries between th e
sl il l and moving image. We now have the capacity at the Aick of a switch to
s low or freeze the mov ing image, or to animate a still one. The equipment
arollnd us is programmed for a bewildering multiplicity of tasks that makes
il progressively difficult to identify the photograph itself as a stable entity
wi lh a privileged existence_ The photograph no longer seems to cut into th e
Ilow o f time itself: instead it seems to present us with a moment selected
lrolll a te mporality that has already been digitally encoded. Thus ' the
pllolog raph' now exists as only one option in an expanding me nu of
lqlrl'scntatioml and performative operations presented by the technology.
Undoubtedly such technological developments demand new theoretical
frameworks that a re based on a dramatica lly different culture of the image.
Y they are also the spu r to look back at the formation of a theoretical and
et
cultural history that we had taken for gra nted, a nd explore elements of the
relationship between photography and film (and by extension video) that
might only now emerge as being significant. The essays in this book are
largely concerned with this project of critica l retrospection.
A number of themes stand out in the essays published here. On the one
hand there is a sense, in all of the contributions, that if we are going to
understand the impact of photographic and filmi c images in contem porary
cu lture we may have to loosen our assumptions about where the boundaries
between these two medium s are to be found ; whether that boundary be
considered tech nologically, culturally or psychically. There is also a strong
sense that we are searching for a term inology that might be more open to a
phe nomenology of the image, to the way in which the image is experienced:
concepts like 'becoming' and 'the event' return in these essays again and
agai n, signalling an approach to the image that is perha ps more he rmeneutic
than post-structuralist. Fina lly, it is also clear that wbat is at stake in our
discussions about stillness and movement, and the different temporalities o f
photography and film , does not ultimately rest with the issue of technology
pe r se. Thus it is not as
if
different technologies might simply be thought
of as mea ns of producing representations of time but as tech nological
ap paratuses through which time itself is constituted and experienced in all
of its multiplici ty.
The conference
Stillness and Time: Photography and the Moving Image,
and henceforth this publication, was made possible by the generous support
of the Univeristy of Brighton, the Kent Institute of Art and Design and the
Surrey Institute of Art and Design University College (the latter two
in stitutions si nce almagamated into the University College of the Creative
Arts). We would like to extend our gratitude to these institutions for their
continued support of Photoforum . We are also extremely grateful to
Photoworks, and in particular David Chandler and Rebecca Drew, for their
commitme nt, time and energy that have made this publication possible.
Ma rking Time: Photography,
Film
and Temporalities of the Image
David Green
Joanna Lowry
David Green
Since
I976
Hiroshi Sugimoto has worked on an on-going series of
photographs entitled
Theatres
which have as their setting and immediate
subject matte r the ornate a rchitectural inte riors of cinema auditoria.
r:ollowing a carefully prescribed formula Sugimoto sets up his large-format
camera in an elevated position on the theatre's balcony, placed centrally and
directly facing the scree n. While the film is projected the camera's shutter
re mains open and the duration of the fi lm determines the exposure ti me of
Ihe photograph . Acting as the only source of illumination, the light reAected
from the screen reveals the space that surrounds it, drawing out of the
dark ness the theatre's cavernous inte rior and its decorative encrusta tion s.
Mthe same time the concentration of li ght from the film proj ector on the
s<reen itsel f results in the over-exposure of the photogra ph leaving an
IIl1ageless void at its centre. (Figure r) In some of the photographs from the
r/lI'r,tres series the white recta ngle of the cinema screen assumes a certain
dt"nseness and solidi ty and thereby evokes comparison to that paradigmatic
1<11111
of modernist abstract pai nting, the monochrome. In othe rs, however,
IIIl' outer edges of the screen are breached by the ligbt e manati ng from it,
dISsolv ing its rigid perimeters and threa tenin g to engulfall matter ca ught
wllhin its glare.
/\s with Sugimoto's other work, the
Theatres
series run s coun ter to
1',,'va; ling conceptions of photogra phy's relationship to instantaneity a nd
III II", photographic image as the record ofa bri ef and transitory moment in
11111. "
He re the photograph is, in a literal way, the embodiment of temporal
d," ,.li on - in a manner that has rarely been so since the infan cy of the
II ",di lll11 - and equally it would seem to demand of the viewer a form
" I ,lli L'ntion that also takes time. 111is sense of the extension of time as
I III" litutive of both the means of production and mode of perception of
i1,,'
pholograph is all the more significant
in
these images since it is achieved
•• 1
II", ,'x pense of ci nema and the medium to which photography is often
, 1111 '<
Il y contrasted. There is indeed a deep irony in the fact that each of
Theatres photographs exists as a r suit of the expi ry of a film ;
,',11 1,
ill
1:11('
borll frol11 th e tran siclil ex istcll cc oflh ousallds of olhe r images
----
Zgłoś jeśli naruszono regulamin