zappers2010.pdf

(285 KB) Pobierz
This circuit is one of the simplest Clark Zapper circuits. There are only 2
resistors, 1 capacitor, an LED and the chip. This circuit is meant to be powered
by a split-bobbin DC power adaptor, as the frequency output of the chip is
around 11,000 hz. If you want to use this circuit with a 9V battery, then change
the 5.1k resistor to a 22k resistor, which will give a frequency output of around
2,500 hz... optimal for the Clark Zapper's use with a 9V battery. You can find
this circuit, without my LED modification, on the internet or in Don Lancaster's
CMOS Cookbook. If you don't need the LED, then just shunt pin 8 and the
negative probe to ground.
The circuit schematic to the above left differs
from the circuit in Dr. Hulda Clark's books in a
few ways. First, there is the lack of the
unnecessary stabilizing capacitor from pin 5 to
ground. Second, there is a polarity-reversal
protection
light-emitting-diode
from
pin-
8/negative-probe to ground, which, thirdly,
eliminates the need of the L.E.D. and its resistor
depicted in Dr. Hulda Clark's original schematic.
This configuration of the L.E.D. alleviates the
problem of the L.E.D. being powered by the
output of the circuit (which lowers the overall
output voltage of the circuit) and thereby
"raises" the output voltage of the circuit. To
minimize the number of parts used, the L.E.D.
serves a dual-purpose. It serves to protect
against power supply polarity-reversal damage
when used with a battery and it's also an
indicator light. Pin 4 doesn't need to be
connected.
The circuit above is very simple. The optimized
reverse-polarity L.E.D. configuration is present.
There is the absence of the stabilizing capacitor
from pin 5 to ground, as the output waveform
differs only in timing when the capacitor is
present (I doubt that the pathogens admire the
accuracy of the tempo of the positive-offset
waveform when the positive-offset waveform is
disintegrating the pathogens). There is not a
power-supply filter-capacitor to filter out the 60-
cycle-hum when using a dc adaptor because the
60-cycle-hum does not hinder the effect of the
Zapper's frequency on the body and, from what I
have seen on the net about multi-frequency
Zappers and from what I have observed when
using an oscilloscope program with the Zapper,
may even assist in destroying pathogens. The
Fixed-LED Zapper 3 and the Simple Zapper 1.1
are the same circuit that merged over time.
This is the Transistor Zapper. I slapped together this version of the Clark Zapper
using common transistor driver stages because I have a lot of transistors that need
to be used. The operating frequency varies between approximately 5khz and
10khz. My body's response to the signal from this design is somewhat the mirror
image of the second oscilloscope screenshot below with the response being most
effective and peaking at around 6.1khz.
The circuits above are the Yin-Yang Clark Zapper Variant and the Chaos Clark Zapper
Variant. In 1991, in Edmonds, Washington, I had been experimenting with Craig
Anderton's Tube Sound Fuzz circuit for guitar. From books and examining guitar pedals,
I knew that many guitar pedals use a supplementary diode configuration, and so I used
the diode configuration with the CD4049 Hex Inverter. Around a year ago, I learned of
Chua's Chaos Generator, which is not really a Chaos Generator, but close, more like a
yin-yang generator, like the circuit to the above left. The circuit to the above right is my
true Chaos Generator. The asymmetrical diode configuration is a fragment of a circuit in
an Electronics Now magazine featured circuit from the 90's and the rest of the circuit is
from Don Lancaster's CMOS Cookbook, Dr. Hulda Clark's book "The Cure for All
Diseases" and an L.E.D. mod that I added, just in case someone doesn't use a split-
bobbin with these circuits.
This circuit filters out most of the 60-hz hum when using a DC adaptor with the Clark Zapper
Variants. This circuit doesn't need to be used with Clark Zapper Variants powered by 9V
batteries.
The screenshot above shows my body's response to a variable-frequency Simple
Zapper with an output of approximately 5 volts. The probe from the computer, a
1/4-inch phone plug, was placed in my mouth against my right cheek. The
handholds/probes from the variable-frequency Simple Zapper are 1" in diameter
and 1.5" in length. As you can see, frequencies above approximately 18,000 hz
do not affect the inside of my mouth as much as frequencies between 4,400 hz
and 18,000 hz. By analyzing the FFT graph that only measures frequencies up
to approximately 22,000 hz, one can deduce that frequencies around 30,000 hz
are not optimal frequencies at which the Zapper should be set. I am in favor of
the frequencies around 15,750 hz because these frequencies appear to be
consistently effective even when my body chemistry changed because my stress
problems that I've had for over ten years "disappeared".
Note: These results were obtained using a variable Clark Zapper, powered by a
12V DC adaptor. The signal amplitude when using Clark Zapper set at ~15,000
hz and powered by a 12V DC adaptor is far greater than when using the Clark
Zapper powered by a 9V battery. When using a 9V battery with the Clark
Zapper, the optimal frequency is approximately 2.5 Khz, the frequency option of
several commercially-available Clark Zappers. I've personally confirmed the
validity of the claim of some commercial Clark Zapper-producing companies that
2.5 Khz is a more effective Clark Zapper frequency than 30 Khz, the Clark
Zapper's original frequency, through the use of the techniques described above.
Again, though, a ~15,000 hz Clark Zapper powered by a 12V DC adaptor is much
more effective than a 2.5 Khz Clark Zapper powered by a 9V battery.
The screenshot above shows my body's response to the "Magic Bullet Zapper",
powered by a 9V DC adaptor. This time, I placed the oscilloscope probe (a 1/4-
inch phone plug) in the sweaty crook of my knee :). I'm glad that I purchased so
many 5.1k resistors (over 500), because they set the output of the "Magic Bullet
Zapper" at around 11,000 hz, which is right at the tip of the amplitude curve of the
screenshot above.
There are several items of interest that seem to be recurring in pop culture that I can see:
Ethanol replacing isopropyl alcohol in beauty and hygiene products...
Ethanol as a viable potential replacement for gasoline...
Herbal entheogenic beer...
Mexico being the next Asia in terms of manufacturing...
Pre-fabricated homes that cost as much as a car...
The Anti-Parasite Pill that has yet to be manufactured by the pharmaceutical industry...
Socialized Medical programs for the U.S.
Lack of Acidosis and Alkalosis (pH balance) knowledge by the general public... (Dr. Morter)
Lack of the knowledge that the Hulda Clark Zapper is a Class II medical device in Canada...
Taxicab vans...
DNA (human genome) identification to end the conflict between the Israelis and
Palestinians...
Garbage dump recycling...
Sewage recycling (for methane and to extract viable chemicals)...
More local broadcasted TV channels for stronger communities...
This page was "lovingly" created by Mas K. in the month of September in the year 2001.
e-mail: mas1911@aol.com
This page is dedicated to my old nanny, Toshiko Komatsubara, whereever she may be.
Oh, by the way, check out C6, Q1, as well as the Mabus and King of Terror quatrains.
Long Live Dr. Hulda Clark & The Dalai Lama!
Zgłoś jeśli naruszono regulamin