Magistrates of the Roman Republic.pdf

(2752 KB) Pobierz
MRR2
99
This file has been produced by Tim Yung Min Schröter under the supervision of Dr. Altay Coskun.
[T. Robert S. Broughton: The Magistrates of the Roman Republic, Vol. I (509 B.C.-100 B.C.).
Published for the American Philological Association by the Press of Case Western Reserve University. leveland,
Ohio 1951, repr. 1968.
Fasti (p. 1-578): not yet digitalised.
Additions and Corrections - Volume I (p. 579-585)
Further Additions and Corrections (p. 585-588)]
T. Robert S. Broughton: The Magistrates of the Roman Republic, Vol. II (99 B.C.-31 B.C.).
Published by the American Philological Association. New York 1952.
Fasti (p. 1-428): to be found on file
MRR2.
Appendix I – Monetales (p. 429-461)
Appendix II – Magistrates of Uncertain Date (p. 462-486)
Appendix III – Supplementary List of Senators (p. 487-498)
Index of Careers (p. 524-636): in full to be found on file
MRR2Ind
and incorporated into RADAR_01
(printed in black)
Note on Chronology (p. 637-639)
Additions and Corrections – Volume I (p. 640-646)
Additions and Corrections – Volume II (p. 646-647)
[T. Robert S. Broughton: Supplement to the Magistrates of the Roman Republic.
Published by the American Philological Association. New York 1960.
Additions and Corrections (p. 1-71)
Errata – Volume I (p. 72)
Errata – Volume II (p. 72-74)
Concordance (p. 82-89)]
T. Robert S. Broughton: The Magistrates of the Roman Republic, Vol. III: Supplement.
Scholars Press. Atlanta, Georgia 1986.
Additions and Corrections (p. 1-225): to be found on file
MRR3
and incorporated into RADAR_01
(printed in italics)
Errata – Volume I (p. 226-235)
Concordance (p. 284-294)
99 B.C. A.U.C. 655
Consuls
M. Antonius M. f. M. n. (28) Pr. 102
A. Postumius - f. - n. Albinus Pat. (*36) Pr. by 102
CIL 1².2.680; Cic. P. Red. ad Quir. 11; Fast. Cap., Degrassi 55f., 128, 478f.; Plin. NH 8.19; Gell. 4.6.1-2; Obseq.
46; Chr. 354 (Antonino et Albino); Fast. Hyd.; Chr. Pasc.; Cassiod.; on Antonius, I. de Delos 4.1.1700; App. BC
1.32; Apul. Apol. 17; and on Postumius, Grueber, CRRBM 1.509. Antonius opposed the agrarian law of Titius
(Cic. De Or. 2.48, cf. 2.265; 3.10; see Tribunes of the Plebs).
Praetors
? C. Cassius Longinius
1
(57) Cos. 96
? C. Coelius Caldus
2
(12) Cos. 94
? Cn. Domitius Ahenobarbus
3
(21) Cos. 96
The latest possible year for his praetorship under the Leges Annales.
Since the governors of Spain in 94 and 93, during and after the consulship of Caelius, are known, his term must precede that of Didius, who
was assigned to Spain while Consul in 98. The emblem of the boar of Clunia on the coins which commemorate him suggest that his province
was Nearer Spain (Graeber, CRRBM 1.475; cf. Wilsdorf, Leipzig. Stud. 1.110; Cesano, Stud. Num. 1.224f.). This is therefore the latest
possible date for his praetorship, but he may have been a Praetor in 100 and a Promagistrate in 99.
3
The latest possible year for his praetorship under the Leges Annales.
2
1
MRR2
99
Aediles, Curule
C. Claudius Pulcher
4
Pat. (302) Cos. 92, Pr. 95
Inscr. Ital. 13.3, no. 70 b-CIL 1
2
. 1, p. 200. Gave especially splendid games, and was the first to use elephants in
venationes (Cic. Verr. 2.4.6 and 133; Har. Resp. 26; Off. 2.57; Val. Max. 2.4.6; Plin. NH 8.19, with the names of
the Consuls; 35.23; cf. 21.6, where the praenomen is P.; Gran. Lic. 38 B).
L. Valerius Flaccus Pat. (*57) Cos. Suff. 86
Cic. Flacc. 77; cf. Schol. Bob. 95 and 105 Stangl.
Tribunes of the Plebs
L. Appuleius Saturninus (29)
L. Equitius (3)
The two Tribunes were killed on their first day of office, December 10, 100 B.C. (App. BC 1.32-33; cf. Cic. Rab.
Perd. 20; Val. Max. 3.2.18; Dio 37.26; and on Saturninus, Inscr. Ital. 13.3.16 and 83-CIL 12.1, p. 195; see 102,
Censors; and 100, Consuls, and Tribunes of the Plebs).
[1]
P. Furius (22)
Vetoed, with Marius' support, a bill to recall Metellus Numidicus (App. BC 1.33; Oros. 5.17.11; cf. Dio 28, fr.
95.1-3; Plut. Mar. 31.1). Proposed the confiscation of the properties of Saturninus and his associates (Oros.
5.17.10). See 98, Tribunes of the Plebs, on Decianus.
Q. Pompeius Rufus
5
(*4) Cos. 88, Pr. 91
M. Porcius Cato
6
(*17)
The bill of these two Tribunes to recall Metellus Numidicus from exile was opposed by Marius (still Consul,
December, 100), and vetoed by Furius (App. BC 1.33; Oros. 5.17.11; cf. Plut. -Mar. 31.1; Gell. 13.20.14; Dio
28, fr. 95.1-3).
Sex. Titius
7
(23)
A sympathizer of Saturninus and author of an agrarian bill which was impeded by bad omens and vetoed by
other Tribunes (Cic. Leg. 2.14 and 3 1; Rab. Perd. 24; Val. Max. 8.1, damn. 3; Obseq. 46, Sextius; cf. Cic. De
Or. 2.48 and 265), and perhaps also author of a law regulating the assignment of quaestorian provinces (Cic.
Mur. 18, referring to 74 B.C.; 'Vat. 12; Schol. Bob. 145 Stangl). Rotondi (333) mentions him also as a possible
author of a Lex de Tutela (but see Niccolini, FTP 443f.).
Quaestors
Ap. Claudius Pulcher
8
Pat. (296) Cos. 79, Pr. 89
T. Mallius (10)
Grueber, CRRBM 1.199; cf. Mommsen, RMW 561, no. 177.
C. Saufeius
9
(3)
He was prosecuted by Appuleius Decianus after his aedileship, which should therefore be dated in 99.
In our sources only the name Pompeius is given, but identification with the Consul of 88 is very probable, since the interval between
tribunate and consulship and the political sympathies of the Tribune both agree with it.
6
The father of Cato of Utica died before 91 (Plut. Cat. Min. 1.1). He had held the tribunate and was a candidate for the praetorship at the
time of his death (Gell. 13.20.14). This tribunate is attributed in Drumann-Groebe (5.214) to L. Porcius Cato, Cos. 89, whose tenure of the
office is not independently attested, but by Niccolini (FTP 205) to Cato's father. On the order of the husbands of Livia, Cato's mother, see
Münzer, APF 295-297.
7
When accused of maiestas, probably in 98, Titius was convicted, mainly because he kept an image of Saturninus in his house (Cic. De Or.
2.48 and 265; Rab. .Perd. 24; Val. Max. 8.1, damn. 3; cf. Cic. Brut. 225; De Or. 2.253).
8
The coins in question contain the forms Ap. Cl., T. Mal., and Q. Urb. The variations in the order of the first two indicate that the third is
rightly interpreted by Mommsen and Grueber to mean Q(uaestores) Urb(ani), not Q. Turb(inius). Claudius should most probably be
identified with the Praetor of 89 (who, though Grueber disagrees, may also be the legionary commander of the name in 87 and the Interrex of
78; see these years), and therefore Mommsen's tentative suggestion of 99, ten years earlier, for his quaestorship a reasonably approximate
date. Mallius is not otherwise known. Cichorius, quoting ILS 8888, is inclined to read Mal(oleius) and to identify this Quaestor with one of
the officers of Pompeius Strabo (RS 146), but the occurrence of the name Mallius in Roman public office in 143 and 105 favors its retention
here.
9
He entered office on December 5, 100 B. C. (Mommsen, Str. 1.606). See App. BC 1.32-33.
5
4
MRR2
99
In office on December 10, 100, during the disorders caused by Saturninus and Glaucia, he seized the Capitol,
was the last of his group to surrender, and was killed in the Curia (App. BC 1.32; cf. Cic. Rab. Perd. 20; Oros.
5.17.8-9).
Promagistrates
M'. Aquillius
10
(11) Cos. 101
Proconsul in Sicily (Liv. Per. 69). Completed the pacification of Sicily and returned to celebrate an ovatio
(Posidonius in FGrH 2A.87, 36, p. 245; Cic. De Or. 2.195; Diod. 36.10.1; Val. Max. 9.13.1; Jerome Chr. ad ann.
96, p. 149 Helm; cf. Cic. Verr. 2.5.5; Liv. Per. 69; Grueber, CRRBM 1.416; Cesano, Stud. Num. 1.220; Degrassi
562). He was later, perhaps in 98, accused of peculation but won acquittal through the appeals of Marius and the
advocacy of M. Antonius (Cic. De Or. 2.194-196; Flacc. 98; Verr. 2.5.3; Brut. 222; Liv. Per. 70; Quintil. inst.
Or. 2.15.7).
[2x]
L. Cornelius Dolabella Pat. (138) Pr. 100?
Proconsul in Farther Spain (Act. Tr. for 98, Degrassi 84f., 562). See 100, Praetors, and 98, Promagistrates.
T. Diditus
11
(5) Cos. 98, Pr. 101?
Cic. Pis. 61; cf. SEG 3.378. See 101, Praetors, and 100, Promagistrates.
Pontifices
C. Iulius L. f. (Caesar Strabo)
12
Pat. (135)
He announced as Pontifex the motion of the spears of Mars in the sacrarium of the Regia (Gell. 4.6.2; cf.
Elogium, Inscr. Ital. 13.3, no. 6-CIL 12.1, p. 198).
[3]
Obsequens (45) places Aquillius' victory in Sicily in 100, but Livy (Per. 69) puts the end of the war after the return of Metellus Numidicus
from exile in 98 (see 98, Tribunes of the Plebs). As he celebrated his ovatio before January 26, 98, when the list of triumphs as preserved in
Act. Tr. begins again (Degrassi 85 and 562), it is best dated in 99.
11
Degrassi (562) and Passerini (Athenaeum 12 [1934] 134ff.) are inclined to date his departure from Macedonia and his return to celebrate
his triumph in 100 B. C.; note in SEG 3.378 the phrase [####]
12
See the genealogy of the Caesars suggested by Münzer in RE 10.183f. Gellius dates the event by the Consuls of 99. Obsequens reports a
similar one in 98.
10
MRR2
98
98 B.C. A.U.C. 656
Consuls
Q. Caecilius Q. f. Q. n. Metellus Nepos (95) Pr. by 101
T. Didius T. f. Sex. n. (5) Pr. by 101
CIL 12.2.681; Fast. Cap., Degrassi 54f., 128, 478f.; Ascon. 63C; Obseq. 47; Chr. 354; Fast. Hyd.; Chr. Pasc.;
Cassiod.; and on Didius, Cic. Mur. 17. They carried a law to require three nundinae in the period from
announcement of a bill to its passage (Cic. Dom. 41; Sest. 135, and Schol. Bob. 140 Stangl; Phil. 5.3; cf. Att.
2.9.1; Leg. 3.11 and 43; Festus 416L), and one to forbid the union of unrelated measures in a single bill (Cic.
Dom. 53). Didius received the province of Nearer Spain (Obseq. 47; see 97-93, Promagistrates).
Praetors
? L. Licinius Crassus
1
(55) Cos. 95
? Q. Mucius Scaevola
2
(22) Cos. 95
Iudex Quaestionis
C. Claudius Pulcher
3
Pat. (302)Cos. 92, Pr. 95
Had charge of the Quaestio de sicariis et veneficis (Elogium, Inscr. Ital. 13.3.70b-CIL 12.1, p. 200).
Tribunes of the Plebs
C. Appuleius Decianus (21)
Brought unsuccessful prosecutions against P. Furius (Tr. Pl. 99), which he lost because he expressed regret for
the death of Saturninus (Cic. Rab. Perd. 24-25; Val. Max. 8.1, damn. 2; cf. Schol. Bob. 95 Stangl), and against
Valerius Flaccus (Aed. Cur. 99; Cic. Flacc. 77), and when he was himself prosecuted and condemned after his
year of office he departed to live in Asia (Cic. Flacc. 77, and Schol. Bob. 95 Stangl; Val. Max. 8.1, damn. 2).
[4x]
4
Q. Calidius (5) Pr. 79
Carried the law which recalled Metellus Numidicus from exile (Cic. Planc. 69; Dom. 87; Val. Max. 5.2.7; Auct.
Vir. Ill. 62.3; cf. Cic. Fam. 1.9.16; P. Red. in Sen. 37-38; P. Red. ad Quir. 6 and 10; Diod. 36.16; Liv. Per. 69;
Val. Max. 4.1.13; Vell. 2.15.4, and 45.3; Plut. Mar. 31.1; App. BC 1.33; Dio 28, fr. 95.1-3; Auct. Vir. I11. 63.1;
Schol. Bob. 176 Stangl; Ampel. 18.14).
C. Canuleius
5
(3)
Brought P. Furius (Tr. Pl. 99) to trial before the assembly for opposing the recall of Metellus Numidicus, but the
assembly is reported to have lynched Furius at once (App. BC 1.33; cf. Dio 28, fr. 95.2-3).
P. Servilius Vatia (Isauricus) (93) Cos. 79, Pr. 90
In all magistracies except the tribunate and the censorship Crassus and Scaevola were colleagues (Cic. Brut. 16 1). On the date, see note 2.
This is the latest possible date in view of the date of his consulship. Balsdon has shown (CR 51 [1937] 8-10) that the phrase in Asconius,
provinciam ..... deposuerat (15 C), refers to his consulship, when his colleague Crassus was demanding a triumph, and means not that he left
his province, which would demand the verb decedere, but that he refused at that time to go to a province at all. Magie in his important recent
work, Roman Rule in Asia Minor (2.1064, note 47) returns to the view that Scaevola's governorship of Asia followed his consulship, since
otherwise the interval between the acts of Scaevola's Legate, Rutilius Rufus, and his prosecution in 92 would be inexplicably long. The
interval however was greater in the case of C. Norbanus (see 103, Tribunes of the Plebs), and of C. Antonius (see 84, Prefects, and 76
Praetors, on M. Lucullus). The balance of political factors in Rome may well have had much to do with the date of the trial of Rutilius. It is
unlikely that Scaevola assumed command of Asia during the year of his praetorship, for he remained in his province only nine months (Cic.
Att. 5.17.5), and his title while there was Proconsul (Liv. Per. 70; cf. OGIS 437 and 439; see 97, Promagistrates).
3
Later practice, as in the case of Julius Caesar, who was Curule Aedile in 65 and Iudex Quaestionis in 64, favors placing the date, even in
this early pre-Sullan instance, in the year after his aedileship (see 99, Aediles).
4
The date is established by the phrase # in Diodorus (36. 10) describing Metellus' exile, and by the statement in Schol. Bob. (176 Stangl)
that his summons to return came from Metellus Nepos (a Consul this year) and Metellus Pius (his son).
5
Niccolini (FTP 205-210) holds that our sources are confused, so that there was only one prosecution of Furius, and the word Canuleius is
simply a mistake on Appian's part for Appuleius. Wehrmann (Volkstrib. 4) and Klebs (RE S. v. "Appuleius" 21) maintain that there was only
one action brought by Appuleius and Canuleius together, while Ziegler (Trib. 18) and Von der Mühll (Saturninus 97 ff.) favor two actions of
differing issue. This view agrees best with the evidence we have. Furius, who had joined the conservative side and was a personal enemy of
Metellus Numidicus, was acquitted when prosecuted by a partisan of Saturninus but did not survive an action based on his enmity for
Numidicus.
2
1
MRR2
98/97
Cic. Dom. 43 (ullius emended by Halm and Lange to P. Servilius). The date of his tribunate can only be
conjectured from that of his praetorship, which it would normally precede by eight or more years. See Niccolini,
FTP 421.
Promagistrates
C. Coelius Caldus (12) Cos. 94, Pr. 99?
Probably Proconsul in Nearer Spain in this year (see 99, Praetors, and note 2).
L. Cornelius Dolabella Pat. (138) Pr. by 100
Celebrated on January 26 a triumph as Proconsul ex Hispania ulteriore de Lusitanis (Act. Tr., Degrassi 84f, 562).
[5]
97 B.C. A.U.C. 657
Consuls
Cn. Cornelius Cn. f. Cn. n. Lentulus Pat. (178) Pr. by 100
P. Licinius M.
1
f. P. n. Crassus (61) Pr. by 100
CIL 1
2
.2.702, 703, SIG³ 726-1. de Delos 4.1.1757; Fast. Cap., Degrassi 54f., 128, 478f.; Plin. NH 10.5; 30.12-
Obseq. 48; Chr. 354; Fast. Hyd.; Chr. Pasc.; Cassiod.; and on Crassus, Cic. Att. 12.24; perhaps also SIG³ 826K
(but see 116, Consuls). Under these Consuls a decree of the Senate forbade human sacrifice (Plin. NH 30.12; cf.
Plut. RQ 83; Cichorius, RS 6ff.). Crassus became governor of Farther Spain (see 96-93, Promagistrates).
Censors
L. Valerius L. f. L. n. Flaccus Pat. (*54, *59, 176) Cos. 100
M. Antonius M. f. M. n. (28) Cos. 99, Pr. 102
Fast. Cap., Degrassi 54f., 128, 478f.; Val. Max. 2.9.5; and on Antonius, I. de Delos 4.1.1700; Cic. De Or. 3.10.
They expelled the Tribune Duronius from the Senate for abrogating a sumptuary law (Val. Max. 2.9.5), and
Antonius was later accused of ambitus by him (Cic. De Or. 2.274). Antonius also adorned the Rostra with his
spoils from Cilicia (Cic. De Or. 3.10). They reappointed M. Aemilius Scaurus as Princeps Senatus (Ascon. In
Scaur. 18 and 22C).
[6x]
Praetors
L. Domitius Ahenobarbus
2
(26) Cos. 94
Praetor in Sicily (Cic. Verr. 2.5.7). He is cited as an example of undue severity because of his strictness in
enforcing his decree that no one should possess weapons (Cic. Verr. 2.5.7; Val. Max. 6.3.5; Quintil. Inst. Or.
4.2.17).
Tribunes of the Plebs
? M. Duronius
3
(3)
Abrogated a sumptuary law, the Lex Licinia (Gell. 2.24. 10; Macrob. 3.17.7), and was expelled from the Senate
by the Censors (Val. Max. 2.9.5; cf. Cic. De Or. 2.274). See above, Censors.
Promagistrates
T. Didius (5) Cos. 98, Pr. 101
Proconsul in Nearer Spain (Act. Tr. for 93; Liv. Per. 70). He was severely engaged in war with the Celtiberi,
4
in
the course of which he slew 20,000 of the Arevaci, destroyed Colenda and moved the population of Termes
In Fact. Cap. for 99 P. Licini is preserved. The filiation is clearly given in Act. Tr. for 93 and Fast. Ant. on the Censors of 89 as M. f., and
though Fast. Cap. for 89 is read in CIL 12 as P. Licinius L. f. P. n. Crassus the top of the letter preserved there has been identified by
Degrassi (54 f.) as part of an M.
2
This is the latest date possible for his praetorship under the Leges Annales. His severity may be due to the recent suppression of the slave
revolt in Sicily, and would indicate that he was probably the successor of Aquillius (see 99, Promagistrates), in which case his term began in
98 at the latest (see however Klein, 58, no. 64). if his title as Praetor is used like that of Verres in Sicily he may have held the praetorship in
Rome before going to Sicily as Propraetor.
3
Niccolini (FTP 210) lists Duronius under 97, the latest possible date. He could have entered office on December 10, 98, and carried his bill
before the elections and entrance upon office of the Censors, probably about April (Mommsen, Str. 2.352). He may however have held the
tribunate in any year after the previous censorship.
1

Plik z chomika:

Inne pliki z tego folderu:

Inne foldery tego chomika:

Zgłoś jeśli naruszono regulamin